Ofsted has identified the key principles of teaching a ‘high-quality’ religious education (RE) curriculum in its latest research review.
The watchdog today published its second research review, following on from a deep dive into science last month.
They say the research reviews will in part help teachers prioritise catch-up content by explaining the most helpful ways of securing progression.
These are some of the key pieces of advice:
1. Teaching should be grounded in academic study
Ofsted say what is taught and learned in RE should be “grounded in what is known about religion or non-religion from academic study”.
Schools should maintain “high expectations about scholarship” in the curriculum as this helps prevent pupils from developing misconceptions about religion and non-religion, they said.
There should also be a consideration of when pupils should relate content of the lesson to their own personal knowledge – for example to challenge prior assumptions.
2. Cover content ‘collectively enough’, rather than ‘superficially’
The curriculum should cover substantive content and concepts “collectively enough”, rather than simply covering “excessive amounts of content superficially”.
Ofsted say that the content covered should allow pupils to “grasp a bigger picture” of the place of religion and non- religion in the world.
Representation of both religious and-non religious traditions should be as “accurate as possible” so that pupils do not develop misconceptions.
3. Well-sequenced curriculum key for dealing with sensitive topics
The schools watchdog advises schools to have a well-sequenced curriculum that prepares pupils with the prior knowledge they need for subsequent topics. This includes content, concepts and vocabulary.
“The importance of this is very clear in the case of controversial and sensitive topics”, Ofsted states.
4.Pupils should learn the ‘ways of knowing’
The research conducted by Ofsted suggests it would be “more useful and constructive” for teachers to plan for pupils to learn ‘ways of knowing’ which are specific to different content.
“For example, they can learn how to know the extent to which particular beliefs are widespread, or suitable tools for interpreting religious texts, or the criteria for valid arguments in analytic philosophy”, Ofsted explains.
Such an approach helps prevent “over-simplifying or stereotyping religion” and “brings to light a variety of perspectives, positions and voices”.
5. Assessments should not be “excessively onerous” on teachers
Ofsted states that leaders should ensure assessments are “not excessively onerous for teachers”.
There should also be professional development opportunities for staff which allow them to reflect on how different assessments frame expectations and engagement.
The research review found it is important the different types of assessment are used appropriately. For example, formative assessment can help identify gaps in knowledge but are less useful when judging how the curriculum as a whole has been learned and remembered.
6. Sufficient time must be allocated to RE
In order to deliver an ambitious RE curriculum there must be sufficient time allocated to its teaching.
Ofsted warns problems can sometimes emerge when RE is “too weakly classified”. At secondary level this may be if RE is delivered through tutor times or in rotation with other subjects.
These approaches “limit the quality of RE” and mean there is not enough time for “teachers to deliver a curriculum of ambitious scope”.
Pupils also benefit when they are taught by subject -specialist RE teachers.
That looks like a perfect guide to “up the creek”. I have heard so much nonsense sprouted about this subject area, but none such meaningless drivel as Ofsted’s “guide to a high quality RE curriculum”. Absolute bollocks! Imagine such “guidance” being applied to the teaching of Mathematics or Grammar!
Culham St Gabriel’s Trust welcomes the publication of Ofsted’s RE Research Review. This review clearly articulates the importance of understanding what we mean by substantive knowledge, ways of knowing or becoming scholarly in RE, and personal knowledge. We support the call for the effective sequencing of knowledge enabling pupils to build towards subject-specific end goals. The review reminds leaders that RE is to be taught in all schools and in all key stages, and that an ambitious curriculum is to be delivered. We believe that this review supports our own vision for a broad-based, critical and reflective education in Religion and Worldviews contributing to a well-informed, respectful and open society.
Dr Kathryn Wright,
CEO, Culham St Gabriel’s Trust
http://www.cstg.org.uk