Academies

REAch2 centralisation plans put on hold by unions

Dispute over funding proposals referred to independent mediator amid fears over 57 jobs

Dispute over funding proposals referred to independent mediator amid fears over 57 jobs

A plan to centralise school reserves and funding at REAch2 is to be paused for ACAS talks

Plans by England’s largest primary-only multi-academy trust REAch2 to centralise school reserves and funding have been put on ice by unions.

The trust, which is the second largest overall in the country, had launched a consultation on moving to a system called general annual grant (GAG) pooling.

Finance and HR services would also be centralised, which the trust previously said would deliver “around £2.5 million of investment…in frontline activities”.

But unions representing trust staff said the plans could lead to the loss of up to 26 per cent of school office staff – around 57 roles.

They have now triggered a “failure to agree” clause under the trust’s trade union recognition agreement.

It comes after unions claimed REAch2 had not given enough detail on its plans and and failed to assess the impact on affected schools.

The trust is said to have refused a previous request from ASCL, NAHT, NASUWT, NEU, Unison, Unite and GMB to halt the plans.

But REAch2 said the “single loudest message” from staff during the consultation had been for it to “move as swiftly as we can to provide certainty about roles”.

Unions have now referred the matter to the Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) to allow for “meaningful discussions” to take place.

Plans will be paused until a resolution between unions and the trust is found.

Cuts would have ‘detrimental’ impact on schools

Outlining their grounds for invoking the clause in a joint letter, unions said the trust had refused to discuss “further financial matters”.

This has “actively undermined our ability to bargain on behalf of our members”, the letter added.

They said the lack of “any impact assessment on the schools affected alongside the lack of detail” in REAch2’s programme meant the consultation period and timeline “is neither fit for purpose or achievable”.

Cuts to office staff would “have a severely detrimental impact on pupils and schools”, they added.

A spokesperson for the trust refuted claims that requested financial information had not been provided to the organisations.

They added that REAch2 took “extremely seriously our duty of care to our staff”, with its executive team making proposed changes in “direct response to what we have heard” from staff.

This included enhanced pay protection, “clearer” job descriptions accompanied by a workload impact assessment and improved salaries.

“Sadly, [unions’] imposed break in consultation means they will not listen to, or discuss, our planned changes as we would expect from meaningful consultation,” they added.

Accounts show trust head office deficit

Schools Week analysis suggests REAch2’s centralisation proposals would help plug a budget gap in the trust’s central team .

The trust’s 60 schools currently receive funding allocated to them according to the government’s national funding formula or local authority funding policies.

The trust takes a 6.5 per cent top-slice of funding to cover central services, including accountancy, HR, estates, risk management and leadership development.

It also holds reserves worth 7 per cent of GAG income.

The trust previously said the shift to pooling all funding instead would mean REAch2 can “look at what each school needs to deliver a great education in the most efficient and effective way”.

Under the proposed plan, cash would sit with the academy trust – which can then dish it out based on its own measures.

Accounts show REAch2 schools received a combined £87.3 million in GAG funding for everyday operations in 2021-22, and had combined reserves of £7.1 million.

But the overall reserves position masks a significant divide between the health of school-level and trust-level balance sheets.

School-level data for 2021-22 shows individual schools had £14.5 million in reserves – whereas the trust’s central team recorded a £7.5 million deficit.

The head office deficit has grown by £1.7 million since 2020-21.

However, schools’ budgets varied significantly, from a £760,000 surplus to a £719,000 deficit – with eight schools in deficit in 2021-22.

Trust grows central team

REAch2 said it had been “building capacity” in its central team over recent years, which has helped it move to a “cluster model” to help individual schools manage workloads.

Under the model, it said schools had been given additional educational, HR and finance support, while building works including 15 new builds were led by the central team.

It added that 93 per cent of its schools were graded good or better by Ofsted, despite only 9 per cent being graded good before joining the trust.

Unison’s head of education, Mike Short, said axing office staff would “mean not only more pressure is heaped on colleagues but less support is available for pupils and parents too”.

“It’s right to put the brakes on these ill-advised plans. Local schools shouldn’t be suffering because the trust’s head office has gone into the red.

But a spokesperson for the trust said: “We simply don’t recognise this characterisation.

“Everything has been about better support for our schools – all of our decision making is done through that lens so that our schools can focus even more time on teaching and learning.”

More from this theme

Academies

Regional director’s merger mission after ‘landgrabs’

Academy commissioner reveals 'countless' merger discussions with CEOs, as he defends DfE's 'coasting' policy

Jack Dyson
Academies

‘Trust quality descriptors miss community focus’

CEO of one of England's biggest MATs calls for sixth 'pillar' of trust quality to be added to guidance

Jack Dyson
Academies

Academy staff could strike over ‘excessive’ GAG pooling

National Education Union members at the Hastings Academy are expected to vote on proposed walkouts

Jack Dyson
Academies

Small academy trusts warned over asking for government advice

Leaders believe chain was pushed towards a merger by the DfE after calling in finance and governance experts

Jack Dyson
Academies

Academy trust defends £40k Teslas for central team staff

Aspirations Academies Trust has paid around £90,000 over three years for the leased vehicles

Jack Dyson
Academies

Trusts struggling to close ‘unacceptable’ gender pay gap

The gap did narrow at 12 of the 20 biggest trusts but there has been little progress in recent...

Lucas Cumiskey

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 Comments

  1. Reach2 really anger me and we are so glad the Unions have stepped in. We don’t want this rushed through, we simply don’t want it to happen. It seems as though the only comment they have picked up on from staff is if it has to happen don’t drag it out, they are not sharing any of the concerns that staff have raised and they are failing to answer all questions that have been asked, clearly not listening to anyone, they have an agenda and are now annoyed anyone has dared to challenge.

    • I find this particularly interesting –

      A spokesperson from the trust says “Everything has been about better support for our schools – all of our decision making is done through that lens so that our schools can focus even more time on teaching and learning” so by cutting back on the Admin Staff in schools this will support the teaching and learning, how? Teachers & TAs work at full stretch as it is and without the additional support provided by the Admin Staff they wont know which way to turn. Very very blinkered of Reach2 – again a clear agenda which is being sold by this is to support schools.
      Interesting times.

    • Totally agree. Cutting support staff will negatively impact pupils and teaching staff and will double the workload of the few staff that are left doing admin. I don’t know any staff that want this propsal hurried through. Reach2 have not listened to any feedback or concerns from staff or families and are pushing through their own agenda to cover financial mismanagement at a central level.

      • sarah

        Yep, I totally agree Jane, they are squirming. Notice to improve has either been served or is on the cards. Just hope when they crash with a bang all those at the top understand how all the ‘lowly’ admin team are feeling at the moment.

        • I also agree, I am thinking that too about a Notice to improve. Also, they say we can ask questions, give feedback but clearly they don’t like it. I think they felt school staff would just sit back and accept it. How wrong are they?

          I do wonder if the new CEO knew what she was getting herself into when she took over. What goes around comes around I guess.